Anyone remember Abu Ghraib?
White House spokesman Scott McClellan on Newsweek's story about the alleged desecration of the Koran at Guantanamo Bay:
"The report has had serious consequences," he said. "People have lost their lives. The image of the United States abroad has been damaged."
Can anyone say Abu Ghraib? Listening to the White House criticize Newsweek is akin to having Keith Richards self-righteously lecture you on the harms of smoking. Abu Ghraib, our extradition policy, the Iraq War, and the illegal detainment of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay have damaged our reputation abroad in a much more profound way.





Comments
In fact, some people kill for a the designers or those who already the rounds of thrift shops. Undoubtedly much value is in an authentic Gucci Bags, or 15 years or 15 minutes old.Gucci Louis VuittonGucci Shoes and Louis Vuitton Shoes started with a small luggage and saddlery company in Florence, where they sell leather that are produced exclusively by artisans of Florence. The entitlement to seek international supportCustomer opens Discount Gucci Handbags Louis Vuitton Handbags i another company, this time in Via Condotti in Rome. Although very popular with Consumers, it was not until 1947 that the first Gucci UK and Louis Vuitton UK reached icon the state with the bag until you have a bamboo handle. The bag was introduced by Gucci Bags Discount, was a great success with the icon of the Gucci Shoulder Bag and Louis Vuitton BagBelt lines deriv>ed from the circle. The symbol LV of the tape strips is so special Louis Vuitton Outlet and so identified with Gucci products, whetherBags or clothing that has been done in a Brand .Another symbol of Gucci Purses and Louis Wallet was introduced some years after LV UK Moccasin handbag with metal spikes.Gucci Handbags Sale.fix it
Make tracks to the nearest lodge in this Columbia Sportswear alpine-inspired zip up Columbia Shoesfeatures the cozy look of a sweater outside and the comfort of soft fleece inside Columbia FEATURES No need to dodge raindropsOmni-ShieldColumbia Mens Shoes water-repellent finishColumbia Sportswear Clothing offers great protection from the elements Columbia Sportswear OutletFlattering seaming at the waist and front slant pockets Shaped fit Made of 100 polyester Heritage sweater fleece Omni-Shield advanced repellency Front slant pocketsColumbia Sportswear Parka Columbia Jackets ALPINE TRAX FULL ZIP Columbia Hiking Shoes Columbia Clothingsweaters Columbia Sportswear Jackets full zip jackets women s sweater Columbia Sportswear Titanium Columbia Sportswear Sale
ed hardy
Wedding Dresses
Links Of London
Lace Wigs.
ugg boots
ed hardy
Posted by: louis vuitton | March 4, 2010 07:55 PM
I'm wiping my ass with pages from the Koran as we speak.
Posted by: Anonymous | May 20, 2005 11:12 PM
and i agree with what David Sirota sez:
The White House's response of "outrage" to the recent Newsweek story is truly a new milestone in hypocrisy for the Bush administration. Just look at their official response yesterday:
"It's puzzling that while Newsweek now acknowledges that they got the facts wrong, they refused to retract the story," White House spokesman Scott McClellan told reporters. "I think there's a certain journalistic standard that should be met and in this instance it was not...The report has had serious consequences. People have lost their lives. The image of the United States abroad has been damaged."
[Source]
The irony of this White House "outrage" at inaccuracies in light of all the lies about Iraq the Bush administration has fed America is really incredible. Here's what the Democrats should say in response:
:
"It's puzzling that while the White House now acknowledged that they haven't found WMD or a link between Al Queda and Iraq, they have refused to retract their claims. I think there's a certain standard of governing that should be met and in this instance has not. The claims the administration used to send this nation to war has had serious consequences. People have lost their lives. The image of the United States abroad has been damaged."
-David Sirota
http://www.davidsirota.com/
Posted by: Jah | May 17, 2005 11:58 AM
to hell with both Newsweek and the Republican party. Newsweek should know better than to publish a story like that based on hearsay, and the Bush Reich should stick a sock in their bleating gob about it - they're one to talk - i agree with Free Willy. they're a bunch of hypocrites and can stick it/J
Posted by: Jah | May 17, 2005 11:55 AM
i love it, Newsweek (maybe Ratherweek is more appropriate now) publishes a story that inflames the Muslim world (not just Arabs) to the point where people ACTUALLY DIED and some suppossedly open-minded people here try to somehow turn it into an anti-US government story "what about Abu Ghraib..." Lets review, hoods on heads and a naked pile-on, in which the aftermath was 26 people Tried and Convicted in a military and civil court of law versus a story from a supossedly neutral magazine (what a laugh) that resulted in the deaths of rioters, put our soldiers lives in danger (you think Muslims tipsters are going to help us out when they believe we desecrated their most sacred book? or does being a liberal mean you only care about the lives of our troops during an election year?) and a further distortion of american policy and initiatives in the Muslim world. If this were Iran, the editors of Newsweek would have their heads on a stick... maybe those fundamentalists arent too far off the mark...
Posted by: replicant212 | May 17, 2005 11:04 AM
Of course the Newsweek story is troubling but the larger issue is the Bush administration's total disregard of world opinion. From the Iraq war, to John Bolton, to careless words about the "axis of evil" and "the old Europe" there has been a pattern of disrespect to Muslims and all non-Americans. It was a travesty that Rumsfeld didn't resign over Abu Ghraib. What's the old saying... "Don't point out a speck in a someone's eye when there is a log in your own"
Posted by: Anonymous | May 16, 2005 01:01 PM
I think the fact of the matter is that Newsweek nor any other publication should be posting stories like that... Suppose they had posted a story about Muslims in New York City burning bibles... what would the reaction have been? There wouldn't have even been one... the fact of the matter is they wouldn't post a story like that. News of the "attrocities" (oh my public humiliation) at Abu Ghraib are plastered all over tv and the newspapers, however when some man trying to earn extra money for his family by working in Iraq has his head chopped off by Muslim extremists he gets an 1/8 of a page in the daily news...
Posted by: pat | May 16, 2005 12:01 PM