Posted by freewilliamsburg on December 4, 2006 12:08 PM|Permalink
Comments
I wouldn't mind Richard doggy style or missionary. I WOULD mind him in rodeo. Perle + rodeo = disaster. The man's not very light. Wouldn't want him breaking anything of mine.
Why not Richard Perle? I wouldn't mind him in that position. Ofcourse, his valuable mind would be used more efficiently in an advisory role. Hopefully McCain will look to the Kagan-Kristol-Perle crowd for direction come 2008.
Actually, Bolton got a lot of reform done (relative to most UN Ambassadors, and to the UN itself) in the notoriously inefficient and inept organization.
Not too happy there won't be someone throwing a hissy-fit when they elect Sudan back onto the Human Rights Committee or some other humanitarian ECOSOC committee.
But if your cynicism proves correct, maybe my worries will dissipate. Power to Bush appointing another reform-minded 'allegiant turd.'
Comments
I wouldn't mind Richard doggy style or missionary. I WOULD mind him in rodeo. Perle + rodeo = disaster. The man's not very light. Wouldn't want him breaking anything of mine.
Posted by: Josh | December 5, 2006 05:40 PM
Why not Richard Perle? I wouldn't mind him in that position.
Richard Perle on September 2003:
"A year from now I'd be surprised if there's not some grand square in Baghdad that is named after President Bush."
Surprise!
Yeah, that's the kinda brain power we need in the UN.
Posted by: Kevin K. | December 5, 2006 03:40 PM
"Why not Richard Perle? I wouldn't mind him in that position."
What are, exactly, the positions in which you WOULDN'T mind Richard Perle?
Posted by: Josh 2, Electric Boogaloo | December 5, 2006 12:07 PM
"Ass-trail" is good, Kevin K., but back in the day we used to call those "swirlies."
And yes, I've left more than my share of swirlies on Bolton's head, face, neck, and chest, thanks for asking.
Posted by: Josh 2, Electric Boogaloo | December 5, 2006 11:10 AM
Why not Richard Perle? I wouldn't mind him in that position. Ofcourse, his valuable mind would be used more efficiently in an advisory role. Hopefully McCain will look to the Kagan-Kristol-Perle crowd for direction come 2008.
Posted by: Josh | December 5, 2006 06:38 AM
Josh, hell, why not Richard Perle? Or Chalabi? Or that ass-trail my cat left on the floor last night when her poop wouldn't drop out?
Posted by: Kevin K. | December 5, 2006 06:27 AM
For a second i thought you meant he was gay. Which may not have been as important on a global scale, but would have been REALLY ironic.
Posted by: Craig | December 5, 2006 03:15 AM
Wouldn't mind a nice stint in New York :p
Posted by: Josh | December 4, 2006 11:08 PM
That criteria alone could put you on the short list, Josh. Fingers crossed, eh?
Posted by: Ben | December 4, 2006 09:37 PM
Actually, Bolton got a lot of reform done (relative to most UN Ambassadors, and to the UN itself) in the notoriously inefficient and inept organization.
Not too happy there won't be someone throwing a hissy-fit when they elect Sudan back onto the Human Rights Committee or some other humanitarian ECOSOC committee.
But if your cynicism proves correct, maybe my worries will dissipate. Power to Bush appointing another reform-minded 'allegiant turd.'
Posted by: Josh | December 4, 2006 08:09 PM
Sweet Jesus, is that a character from a Wes Anderson movie? He shoulda chose a wig the same color of his 'stache.
Posted by: Bob King Neverland III | December 4, 2006 08:05 PM
I always thought Bolton had the best style.
Posted by: Erik | December 4, 2006 05:28 PM
As if he won't be replaced by an equally repugnant Bush allegiant turd?
Posted by: Dookie Head | December 4, 2006 12:59 PM