W-Burg Guides



BuzzFeed
Add to Your Site



Archives


· November 2008 · October 2008 · September 2008 · August 2008 · July 2008 · June 2008 · May 2008 · April 2008 · March 2008 · February 2008 · January 2008 · December 2007 · November 2007 · October 2007 · September 2007 · August 2007 · July 2007 · June 2007 · May 2007 · April 2007 · March 2007 · February 2007 · January 2007 · December 2006 · November 2006 · October 2006 · September 2006 · August 2006 · July 2006 · June 2006 · May 2006 · April 2006 · March 2006 · February 2006 · January 2006 · December 2005 · November 2005 · October 2005 · September 2005 · August 2005 · July 2005 · June 2005 · May 2005 · April 2005 · March 2005 · February 2005 · January 2005 · December 2004 · November 2004 · October 2004 · September 2004 · August 2004 · July 2004 · June 2004 · Nov. 1998 - May 2004

Our Books



Williamsburg & Brooklyn Links


New York and Williamsburg Apartment Listings


Music


Politics


Blogs We Like






Interviews



Advertise With Us

About Us

Founding Editor:
Robert Lanham

Senior Editor:
Brian Ries

Senior Arts Editor:
Elizabeth Brady

Arts Editor:
Lisa Baldini

Film Editor:
Dave Thomas



Add me to your
mailing list



Powered by
Movable Type 3.2


Advertise on New York blogs


OSAMA COUNTER






« Grand Archives | Main | Spike Jonze/Dave Eggers' Where The Wild Things Are To Be Reshot? »

The Real McCain Story

ap_john_mccain_070425_ms.jpg

Look, we loathe McCain as much as the next guy but today's New York Times story is in bad form. Sure, he's been overly cozy with lobbyists and his "let's reform Capitol Hill" mantra is nothing but rhetoric. He was part of the Keating Five scandal, for Christ’s sake, which cost tax payers billions of dollars. More recently, he betrayed his own McCain-Feingold Act by setting up the nonprofit Reform Institute from which he funneled hundreds of thousands in soft money to his own campaigns. And who can forget his we could be in Iraq for a 100 years war mongering? McCain’s sleazebag credentials are solid.

But did the paper really need to make insinuations about his sex life? Especially since these insinuations come from anonymous sources who were merely "concerned that his relationship [with Iseman] had become romantic." Sounds like the Times is grasping at straws, not to mention making us queasy by forcing us to think about John McCain having sex. Their anonymous sources all stop short of claiming an affair actually happened. If they've got hard evidence that McCain was sleeping with a lobbyist (whose clients benefited from the tryst) then let's see it. Otherwise, making insinuations about a candidate's personal life on such shaky evidence is truly below the belt. Didn't we learn our lesson from Monicagate? The Times made the right decision to expose "the Maverick's" hypocrisy, but printing unfounded insinuations about an affair to generate interest in their story is Murdoch territory. Even if the rumors turn out to be true, it’s unethical to report them with such flimsy evidence.

The real story the press should be focusing on in regard to McCain is his vote last week to green-light torture. As a former prisoner-of-war and a so-called advocate of human rights, McCain's vote to approve waterboarding is disgraceful. This is the story that the New York Times, and the other major media outlets for that matter, should be covering. It boggles the mind that McCain’s endorsement of torture wasn’t the story the Times chose to place on their front page today.

Comments

McCain is a douche, but the Times should have known better. Shameful

Post a comment

Verification (needed to reduce spam): Can't read the above words? Click the circular arrows for a new anti-spam test.