
Human Nature
Review by Paul McLeary
Screenwriter
Charlie Kaufman is back, but should we care? Like his last
film, (Being John Malcovich), he's managed to make
an interesting, though emotionally flat and unengaging film
that seems like it wants to make a point, but never figures
out what that point might be. While "Malcovich"
was written well enough and is admittedly one of the more
original scripts to be made by a studio recently, it still
seemed somehow constrained. Time and again, just as the
film appeared primed to take off in some magic realist direction,
it always stopped short of its promised insanity. Sure,
a hole in an office wall (on the 7th and a half floor) led
straight into Malcovich's brain, and people lined up for
hours for a glimpse of life from his eyes - that's funny
and original, but Kaufman, and director Spike Jonze stopped
trying after that. The movie ended up as a somewhat interesting
send-up of our celebrity obsessed culture, but was too lazy
to try and dig deeper or otherwise engage the audience in
a dialogue pertaining to anything beyond the superficialities
of the idea. Good enough for some light entertainment, but
in the end it was little more than a self-indulgent exercise.
If only Human Nature could even boast of some of these
qualities, it would be a much better film. The film actually
starts out strong, cutting between three different stories
- Puff (Rhys Ifans) is testifying before what appears to
be a Congressional panel, describing his liaison with Lila,
(Patricia Arquette) an abnormally hairy woman who has chosen
a life in the woods, and a murder. Their victim, Dr. Nathan
Bronfman (Tim Robbins), was Lila's lover and Puff's rehabilitator.
Puff, you see, was raised in the woods by his father, who
was convinced that he was an ape. Accordingly, he raised
Puff as an ape. Bronfman and Lila stumble on Puff one day
as they're hiking in the woods, and Bronfman takes him back
to his laboratory where his experiments teaching table manners
to mice led him to try to civilize Puff, squelching his
sexuality with electroshock treatments and turning him into
a civilized, tweed-jacket wearing man of culture. The film
briefly becomes reminiscent of Mel Brooks' Young Frankenstein
when Bronfman takes Puff out on the lecture circuit and
makes him waltz with his wife. Unbeknownst to Bronfman,
however, after these performances, Puff go out drinking
and hooks up with prostitutes in alleyways.
Eh. Funny in parts, but it's almost too obvious and you
can see where it's going from the outset. Bronfman, obsessed
with cleanliness, doesn't know that his live-in girlfriend
Lila has a coat of hair covering her body because she shaves
every night. Lila, for her part, doesn't know that Bronfman
has started sleeping with his sexy French assistant.
In the end, everyone seems to learn their lesson, trite
as it is. Lila discovers Bronfman's infidelity and runs
off to the woods with Puff to live "naturally",
Bronfman gets his and a heroic decision must be made. It
seems that the overarching theme to the movie is that human
being are ruled by their sex drive, and everything we do
in some way relates to our desire to get laid. While admittedly
this may be true on some level, Kaufman and director Michael
Gondry really strip the nuance and the subtly from interpersonal
relations and deliver the message that at heart, everyone
really is pretty crummy.
|