This Is Guaranteed To Make You Sick
Somehow, we have a little less sympathy for the Times’ financial burdens after reading this story they crassly decided to print. You Try to Live on 500K in This Town. [Thanks Jeff]
Somehow, we have a little less sympathy for the Times’ financial burdens after reading this story they crassly decided to print. You Try to Live on 500K in This Town. [Thanks Jeff]
$8.50 for a frozen hot chocolate? For that, I can get 2 PBRs and a shot of whiskey at ArtLand, and hot chocolate doesn’t even make you drunk.
Disgusting. Living check to check on
$3m a year? Well, apparently they’re as irresponsible with their own money as they were everyone else’s.
How utterly tasteless of the Times to run this piece of shit. That’s as tactless as launching a show called “Dirty Sexy Money” in the middle of a recession.
Apparently people know how to read, but they do no seem to comprehend. The articles title is tongue and cheek and is meant to show the no hold bar extravagance of our idiotic elite as apposed in some way attempt to draw sympathy, read an entire article and actually understand what is being communicated before actually jumping to conclusions and bringing down judgment. What should be bemoaned is not the piece, but rather everyone interviewed for the piece who seem to believe entitlement for these items and pay. Attack the system that makes it possible for these people to live the lives that they do, not the messenger who informs you of them.
Cheers
I second Noah.
You should learn the difference between editorializing and journalistic writing.
When there is a story about war, do you also think that is a endorsement of war?
If there is a story about a murder, that must mean the paper promotes murdering, right?
But I guess you can’t expect that level of thought from a hipster blog.